Identification of Risks when Declaring Compliance of Products

Identification of Risks when Declaring Compliance of Products

A.V. Kraevthe lead engineer on quality of LLC Arvato Rus; Yaroslavl
e-mail: alex.kraev@gmail.com
 
V.A. Ivanovacandidate of technical sciences, associate professor of the Yaroslavl state technical university; Yaroslavl
 
The article establishes the sources, causes and consequences of the risk of the declaration of conformity using the methodology of functional modeling IDEF0.
The risk in declaring compliance is the appearance on the market the products that do not meet the requirements of technical regulations, i.e. dangerous to the consumer.
It has been established that the following processes belong to the sources of risk when declaring compliance: sampling of products; product testing; production control; study of the sample for the planned production as a typical representative of products used at hazardous production facilities; analysis of the technical documentation submitted by the applicant and its preliminary assessment; on-site testing or sample testing as representative of all subsequently manufactured products; evaluation of the results of tests (studies) from the standpoint of evidence of product compliance with the requirements of technical regulations; analysis of the new requirements for products for equivalence and completeness presented by the applicant in comparison with those established in technical regulations; analysis of the evidence of compliance submitted by the applicant (results of calculations, experiments) with the requirements established in technical regulations; assessment of the risk of harm when applying the requirements proposed by the applicant; management system certification.
 
Keywords: declaration of conformity, risk source, risk causes, process, IDEF0.
 
References:
1. Contract on the Eurasian Economic Union. Available at: http://www.economy.gov.ru
2. Federal Law of December 27, 2002 No. 184-FZ «On technical regulation». Rossiyskaya Gazeta of December 31, 2002 N 245, the Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002, No. 52 (part I), Article 5140. p. 27.
3. Decision of the Commission of the Customs union of April 7, 2011 N 621 «Provision on an order of application of standard schemes of assessment (confirmation) of compliance to requirements of technical regulations of the Customs union». Available at: http://www.tks.ru/docs/10021041.
4. Ivanova V.A. Who treats participants of obligatory certification? Century of quality. 2009, No. 6. pp. 32–44.
5. Ivanova V.A., Kraev A.V. The analysis of requirements to declaring of compliance in technical regulations. Compliance assessment methods. 2013, No. 6. pp. 24–27.
6. Rodionov A.S. Risk management and risks of management in a turbulent business environment. Actualscience. 2016. No. 4, volume 2. pp. 99–101.
7. Panochkina L.V. Modular application «1C: risk management» as an innovation in risk management of investment and construction projects. Russian business. 2014, No. 5(251). pp. 49–54.
8. Lurye K.M. Modeling of strategy of management of risk of liquidity of a banking system of the Russian Federation as instrument of management of monetary policy. Kazan economic bulletin. 2012, No. 1. pp. 69–75.
9. Kashinova N.E. Identification and classification of risks as instruments of risk management in crisis management by the modern enterprise. Scientific and methodical online magazine a concept. 2014, No. 5. pp. 101–105.
10. Zhuravleva M.A. Management of risk as part of a control system of labor protection. Modern tool systems, information technologies and innovations. Collection of scientific works of the XI International scientific and practical conference. 2014, volume 2. pp. 75–79.
11. GOST P 51897-2011. Management of ISO 73:2009. Management of risk. Terms and definitions: National standard of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2012. 13 p.
12. State standard of Russia ISO/MEK 31010-2011. Management of risk. Risk assessment methods. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2012. 70 p.
13. R 50-1-028-2001. Information technologies of support of life cycle of products. Methodology of functional modeling. Moscow, Standards Publishing House. 2003. 50 p.
14. Ivanova V.A., Kraev A.V. Research of declaring of compliance with application of methodology of functional modeling of IDEF0. Reference book. The engineering magazine with the application. 2012, No. 11. pp. 39–43.
15. Ivanova V.A., Kraev A.V. Production control when declaring compliance. Quality and life. 2015, No. 4(8). pp. 69–73.
 
DOI: 10.34214/2312-5209-2019-22-2-69-73

Back to top