Improving the Design Efficiency of Complex Systems Based on Reducing the Power of Many Generated Alternatives

Improving the Design Efficiency of Complex Systems Based on Reducing the Power of Many Generated Alternatives

J.V. Doronina, doctor of technical sciences, professor of department «Information technologies and computer systems» of the Sevastopol state university; Sevastopol
e-mail: YVDoronina@sevsu.ru
 
The article proposes an approach to the structural synthesis of elements of a system-technical complex, which consists in using a modified genetic algorithm and a method for narrowing the cardinality of the sets of alternatives. The modification of the genetic algorithm is implemented as part of a directed mutation operation for three types of the initial elemental composition of the alternative and is used for objects with a given (limited) duration of their life cycle. Application of the proposed approach made it possible to both reduce efforts in obtaining alternatives at the stage of designing elements of a system-technical complex, and to reduce labor intensity in the formation of the appearance of the system.
Keywords: system-technical complex, structural synthesis, cardinality narrowing, genetic algorithm, directed mutation.
References:
1.   Kirillov A.N. Dynamical systems with variable structure and dimension. Instrumentation. 2009. No. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dinamicheskie-sistemy-s-peremennoy-str...(Accessed 01 of July 2020).
2.   Melnikov N.S. Synthesis of variable structure systems taking into account the characteristics of real elements. Scientific notes of the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute. 1974, no. 6. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sintez-sistem-peremennoy-struktury-s-u...(date of access: 07/01/2020).
3.   Korobko A.A. Algorithm for generating software components of a model-oriented system. Educational resources and technologies. 2016, no. 2 (14). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/algoritm-generatsii-programmnyh-kompon...(date accessed: 29.06.2020).
4.   Flegontov A.V. Structural synthesis: methods, algorithms, models, computer support. Proceedings. Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2002, issue 1, volume 1. pp. 316–332.
5.   Simon D. Algorithms of evolutionary optimization. DMK Press. Moscow, 2020. 940 p.
6.   Bozhko A.N., Tolparov A.Ch. Structural synthesis on elements with limited compatibility. Available at: http://www.techno.edu.ru:16001/db/msg/13845.html (date accessed: June 29, 2020).
7.   Shkurina G.L., Kandyrin Yu.V. Automation of multicriteria truncation of a set of technical objects. Collection of scientific works SWorld: materials of the international scientific-practical conference «Scientific research and their practical application. The current state and development paths ‘2013». 2013, issue 3, volume 5. pp. 63–66.
8.   Voloshin A., Malyar N., Shvalagin O. Fuzzy algorithm of sequential analysis of options. International Book Series «Information Science and Computing». Available at: http://www.foibg.com/ibs_isc/ibs-15/ibs-15-p25.pdf.
9.   Doronina Yu.V., Ryabovaya V.O. Method of modernization of environmental monitoring information systems based on the analysis of their functional load. Proceedings. Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2016, issue 1, volume 44. pp. 133–153.
10. Okhtilev M.Yu., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. Intelligent technologies for monitoring and controlling the structural dynamics of complex technical objects. The science. Moscow, 2006. 410 p.
DOI: 10.34214/2312-5209-2020-27-3-27-32

Back to top